-------------------------------------------------------------- Permission granted by author for anyone to distribute this writing free of charge (including translation into any language)...under condition that no profit is made therefrom, and that it remain intact and complete, including title and credit to the original author. Ezekiel J. Krahlin http://surf.to/gaybible -------------------------------------------------------------- ART BELL'S "HARD CALL" © 1997 by Ezekiel J. Krahlin (Jehovah's Queer Witness) Like many late-night radio listeners, I relish these spooky shows that dabble in the bizarre, the occult, speculations, conspiracies, and UFO's...of which Art Bell's syndicated talk show is a successful modern classic. But it has come to my attention that, every time the issue of homosexuality comes up, Mr. Bell waffles on the issue, caving in each time--in his own typically gentle demeanor--to homophobic sentiments parroting right wing KKKristians. So one night when the topic of same-sex marriages came up, I faxed the following letter...after our famous syndicated talk show host concluded that it would be a "hard call" for him to attend a daughter's wedding, if this hypothetical daughter were lesbian, and her mate likewise. (Needless to say, my plaint was ignored, with neither a statement on air, nor personal reply.) ........................................... TO: Art Bell, talk show FROM: Ezekiel J. Krahlin DATE: June 4, 1996 RE: Same-sex Marriage. ........................................... As a "gay" male, I refuse to attend any heterosexual weddings. This is one way I take a stand against a horrible and tenacious prejudice in our society called "homophobia". Not until gay marriages are accepted (if ever), will I attend a hetero wedding. I believe that too few gays take such a stand; and that is a shame. Before I continue, I want to explain my distaste for the term "gay", and why I prefer another word, instead. "Gay" perpetuates the stereotype of homosexual as being silly, flighty, weak willed and limp wristed. Just as women don't care for chauvinists who perceive them as being hysterical and out of control of their emotions--by virtue of their feminine nature--I rebel against being defined and perceived as "gay". It is truly a silly word, and one without any dignity. (And "homosexual" is too clinical a term--like an insect being pinned downed and observed under a magnifying glass.) "Lesbian", however, is a fine word for the homosexual female. It is a beautiful word whose name comes from a small island famous for the great female poet of classical Greece: Sappho. So I have likewise chosen a region from ancient Greek history, and applied it to the male homosexual...to replace the sickeningly ineffectual word "gay". And the word I have come up with is: "Thracian". Thrace was a region external to Greece, which later became incorporated into the Hellenic culture...a large part of which was Alexander The Great's homeland, Macedonia. Henceforth, I will use the word "Thracian" in place of the term "gay". I wouldn't be proud to admit being "uncomfortable" re. Thracian marriages...any more than I would be proud to admit disgust at interracial marriages. I have heard your verbal confession--and that of some callers--to a self admitted form of homophobia...which is being "uncomfortable" and/or "nauseated" at the thought. There is nothing more dignified in a relationship between two loving friends, than to declare their lifelong commitment of devotion to each other--be they hetero or homo--in the contract we call "marriage". Any difficulty in accepting this plain truth--be it mild, moderate, intense, or rabid--is a phobia which, in some people, extends well beyond simple neurosis into full blown psychosis. You, my dear Mr. Bell, are fortunately a mere neurotic on this issue. It saddens and angers me greatly, that our so-called "progressive, democratic" society is still debating whether or not I--along with millions of other homosexuals--are criminals in society's eyes. To deny Thracians and Lesbians the legitimacy of marriage is to perpetuate our status as second-class citizens. Society persists in defining same-sex love relations as basically (and always) inferior to that between a woman and a man. But in truth: the ability to make babies does not raise anyone's status over those who can not...for it takes no brains to insert rod A into slot B. (As a matter of fact, it takes so little brains, that we are breeding ourselves into extinction, by the looming threat of devastating global overpopulation.) In actuality, it is God who makes babies...we are merely the vessels. "Making" a human being, however, is a different issue...and depends on not just the immediate family, but on the community and society at large. The ability to "make" a good person is not dependent in any way, on one's sexual tastes...nor on one's color, world view, or ethnic heritage. Hence, so- called "family values" are not really a monopoly of the limited (in more ways than one) nuclear family. The values of trust, dignity, fidelity, responsibility, and friendship are really social and community values...values for the one true, global family that is the human species. So get off it, Art. Why on earth would you find it a "hard call" to decide on whether or not to attend a relative's same-sex marriage? What is your problem...chupacabra got your tongue? ...........................................(end of fax) Note: "Chupacabra" is a fantastic, ghoul-like creature in contemporary Latin American myth, showcased at that time on Art Bell's Web Site and radio show. (Click on picture to teleport.) ---finis